Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLoi, Shrushma
dc.contributor.authorJoshee, Paras
dc.contributor.authorOttridge, Ryan
dc.contributor.authorWoolley, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorGkini, Eleni
dc.contributor.authorAsherson, Philip
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Allan H.
dc.contributor.authorAl-Janabi, Hareth
dc.contributor.authorBroome, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Anya
dc.contributor.authorGottlieb, Natalie
dc.contributor.authorHindmarch, Paul
dc.contributor.authorSilman, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Paritosh
dc.contributor.authorJuruena, Mario
dc.contributor.authorNair, Rajesh
dc.contributor.authorMukherjee, Tirthankar
dc.contributor.authorKatshu, Mohammad Zia Ul Haq
dc.contributor.authorMarwaha, Steven
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-09T10:12:06Z
dc.date.available2026-01-09T10:12:06Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.citationA randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of stimulant compared with non-stimulant medication for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and a history of Psychosis or biPolar disordER: SNAPPERen_US
dc.identifier.other10.1186/s13063-025-09214-w
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/20049
dc.description© The Author(s) 2025. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.description.abstractAttention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder involving inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity, which starts in childhood and frequently persists into adulthood. Stimulant and non-stimulant medication are the mainstay of treatment in adults. ADHD in adults is commonly comorbid in people with severe mental illness (SMI) such as bipolar disorder (bipolar) and psychosis. There is substantial uncertainty over the effectiveness of stimulant and non-stimulant medication in adult ADHD comorbid with SMI. There is also concern that they could trigger or worsen psychotic or manic symptoms. Whilst National Institute of Health and Care Evidence (NICE) ADHD guidelines indicate available evidence does not justify a deviation from their main recommendations of using stimulants first line, this is based on limited studies within this comorbid population. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) is needed to address this evidence gap. We present a protocol for a pragmatic, observer-blind, multi-centre, two-arm, RCT called SNAPPER that aims to investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of stimulant compared with non-stimulant medication for adults with ADHD and a history of SMI.
dc.description.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-025-09214-wen_US
dc.formatFull text uploaded
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.subjectAttention deficit disorder with hyperactivityen_US
dc.subjectPsychosisen_US
dc.subjectBipolar disorderen_US
dc.subjectPharmacologyen_US
dc.titleA randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of stimulant compared with non-stimulant medication for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and a history of Psychosis or biPolar disordER: SNAPPERen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
refterms.dateFOA2026-01-09T10:12:07Z
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
refterms.dateFirstOnline2025-11-06
html.description.abstractAttention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder involving inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity, which starts in childhood and frequently persists into adulthood. Stimulant and non-stimulant medication are the mainstay of treatment in adults. ADHD in adults is commonly comorbid in people with severe mental illness (SMI) such as bipolar disorder (bipolar) and psychosis. There is substantial uncertainty over the effectiveness of stimulant and non-stimulant medication in adult ADHD comorbid with SMI. There is also concern that they could trigger or worsen psychotic or manic symptoms. Whilst National Institute of Health and Care Evidence (NICE) ADHD guidelines indicate available evidence does not justify a deviation from their main recommendations of using stimulants first line, this is based on limited studies within this comorbid population. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) is needed to address this evidence gap. We present a protocol for a pragmatic, observer-blind, multi-centre, two-arm, RCT called SNAPPER that aims to investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of stimulant compared with non-stimulant medication for adults with ADHD and a history of SMI.en_US
rioxxterms.funder.project94a427429a5bcfef7dd04c33360d80cden_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Loi 2025 1-14.pdf
Size:
1.162Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record