Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHosseini, Akram A.
dc.contributor.authorShao, Beili
dc.contributor.authorLee, Abigail Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorDhillon, Permesh
dc.contributor.authorJunaid, Kehinde
dc.contributor.authorGran, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorSellars, Peter
dc.contributor.authorSargisson, Hannah
dc.contributor.authorJung, JeYoung
dc.contributor.authorMukaetova-Ladinska, Elizabeta B.
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-09T11:02:19Z
dc.date.available2026-01-09T11:02:19Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.citationHosseini, A. A., Shao, B., Lee, A. R., Dhillon, P., Junaid, K., Gran, B., Sellars, P., Sargisson, H., Jung, J. & Mukaetova-Ladinska, E. B. (2025). The cognitive and neuroimaging for neurodegenerative disorders study (CogNID) : design and initial findings from real-world clinical practice. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 16.en_US
dc.identifier.other10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1630082
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/20050
dc.description© 2025 Hosseini, Shao, Lee, Dhillon, Junaid, Gran, Sellars, Sargisson, Jung and Mukaetova-Ladinska. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Dementia presents with significant heterogeneity across age groups, particularly in early-onset cognitive decline (EOCD), which poses diagnostic and management challenges. The Cognitive and Neuroimaging for Neurodegenerative Disorders (CogNID) study aims to characterise clinical, cognitive, neuroimaging, and biomarker features across a diverse cohort of individuals with cognitive impairment, with a focus on diagnostic complexity, biomarker utility, and mortality.MethodsOut of 680 study participants within this prospective cohort enrolled from the real-world clinics within the National Health Service, who consented to take part in the study, we analysed data from 429. Individuals were recruited between December 2018 and November 2024 from the Memory Clinics, including the early-onset dementia service and associated services. Participants underwent structured cognitive assessments, neuroimaging (MRI/CT), and Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker evaluation, where available. Diagnoses were made by multidisciplinary consensus. Group comparisons were conducted between early-onset (EOCD, <65 years) and late-onset cognitive decline (LOCD, ≥65 years).ResultsOf the 429 participants, 349 (81.4%) had EOCD and 80 (18.6%) had LOCD. The mean age was 60.05 years, with no significant difference in sex or ethnicity across groups. Depression and anxiety were common (29.6%), as were cardiovascular risk factors. Lumbar punctures were more frequently performed in EOCD (p = 0.03), with 36.4% of tested participants demonstrating biomarker profiles consistent with Alzheimer’s disease (A+T+). Functional cognitive disorder (FCD) was more common in EOCD (22.3% vs. 5.0%, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed significantly lower ACE-III scores and higher pathological CSF findings in Alzheimer’s disease versus FCD. Mortality was higher in the LOCD group (11.3% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.03).ConclusionThe CogNID study highlights the clinical and diagnostic heterogeneity of individuals with cognitive impairment, particularly in younger adults. Incorporating neuroimaging and CSF biomarkers into routine clinical pathways enhances diagnostic precision and reveals distinct phenotypic profiles between EOCD and LOCD. These findings underscore the need for harmonised diagnostic protocols, broader biomarker accessibility, and inclusive recruitment strategies in dementia research and clinical services.
dc.description.urihttps://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1630082en_US
dc.formatFull text uploaded
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.subjectNeurodegenerative diseasesen_US
dc.subjectNeuroimagingen_US
dc.subjectDementiaen_US
dc.titleThe cognitive and neuroimaging for neurodegenerative disorders study (CogNID) : design and initial findings from real-world clinical practiceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
refterms.dateFOA2026-01-09T11:02:20Z
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
refterms.dateFirstOnline2025-10-29
html.description.abstractIntroduction: Dementia presents with significant heterogeneity across age groups, particularly in early-onset cognitive decline (EOCD), which poses diagnostic and management challenges. The Cognitive and Neuroimaging for Neurodegenerative Disorders (CogNID) study aims to characterise clinical, cognitive, neuroimaging, and biomarker features across a diverse cohort of individuals with cognitive impairment, with a focus on diagnostic complexity, biomarker utility, and mortality.MethodsOut of 680 study participants within this prospective cohort enrolled from the real-world clinics within the National Health Service, who consented to take part in the study, we analysed data from 429. Individuals were recruited between December 2018 and November 2024 from the Memory Clinics, including the early-onset dementia service and associated services. Participants underwent structured cognitive assessments, neuroimaging (MRI/CT), and Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker evaluation, where available. Diagnoses were made by multidisciplinary consensus. Group comparisons were conducted between early-onset (EOCD, <65 years) and late-onset cognitive decline (LOCD, ≥65 years).ResultsOf the 429 participants, 349 (81.4%) had EOCD and 80 (18.6%) had LOCD. The mean age was 60.05 years, with no significant difference in sex or ethnicity across groups. Depression and anxiety were common (29.6%), as were cardiovascular risk factors. Lumbar punctures were more frequently performed in EOCD (p = 0.03), with 36.4% of tested participants demonstrating biomarker profiles consistent with Alzheimer’s disease (A+T+). Functional cognitive disorder (FCD) was more common in EOCD (22.3% vs. 5.0%, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed significantly lower ACE-III scores and higher pathological CSF findings in Alzheimer’s disease versus FCD. Mortality was higher in the LOCD group (11.3% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.03).ConclusionThe CogNID study highlights the clinical and diagnostic heterogeneity of individuals with cognitive impairment, particularly in younger adults. Incorporating neuroimaging and CSF biomarkers into routine clinical pathways enhances diagnostic precision and reveals distinct phenotypic profiles between EOCD and LOCD. These findings underscore the need for harmonised diagnostic protocols, broader biomarker accessibility, and inclusive recruitment strategies in dementia research and clinical services.en_US
rioxxterms.funder.project94a427429a5bcfef7dd04c33360d80cden_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Hosseini 2025 1-14.pdf
Size:
696.1Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record