• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust
    • Medicine
    • Medicine
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust
    • Medicine
    • Medicine
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of EMERCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Links

    About EMERPoliciesDerbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation TrustLeicester Partnership TrustNottingham and Nottinghamshire ICSNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustSherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Of Leicester NHS TrustOther Resources

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Evaluating advanced clinical practitioners' engagement with the four pillars of advanced practice in the UK: a scoping review

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Alsararatee, Hasan H
    Keyword
    Advance Practice Nursing
    Leadership
    Education, Nursing, Continuing
    Date
    2025-12-25
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    DOI
    10.12968/hmed.2025.0103
    Publisher's URL
    https://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/full/10.12968/hmed.2025.0103
    Abstract
    Aims/Background Despite national frameworks outlining the four pillars of advanced practice (clinical practice, leadership and management, education, and research), engagement of Advanced Clinical Practitioners (ACPs) in the UK remains inconsistent, and significant challenges persist. This scoping review aimed to explore ACPs’ engagement with each pillar and to identify both successful and challenging factors. Methods A scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O’Malley’s framework in 2005 and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A systematic search was undertaken across five databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycInfo, and Cochrane Library) and grey literature sources. The search covered studies published from 2017 to 2025, in line with the introduction of the Multi-professional Framework. A three-stage screening process was used to identify eligible studies, and data were extracted using a standardised form. Thematic analysis was employed to synthesise the findings. Results Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. The review identified strong ACP engagement in clinical practice, including contributions to direct patient care, improved patient satisfaction, and reduced waiting times. However, engagement with the leadership, education, and research pillars was inconsistent and often limited by excessive workload, lack of protected time, and ambiguity in role definitions. Structural variation across National Health Service (NHS) trusts further contributed to disparities in advanced clinical practice role development and utilisation. Conclusion Advanced clinical practice roles are firmly embedded in clinical care but remain underutilised in leadership, research, and education. Addressing these disparities requires clearer career pathways, organisational investment, and structured policy support to enable ACPs to contribute fully across all four pillars of practice.
    Citation
    Alsararatee HH. Evaluating Advanced Clinical Practitioners' Engagement With the Four Pillars of Advanced Practice in the UK: A Scoping Review. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2025 Dec 25;86(12):1-21. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2025.0103. Epub 2025 Dec 18.
    Type
    Article
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/20072
    Collections
    Medicine

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2026)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.