Variations in access to and reimbursement for continuous glucose monitoring systems for people living with Type 1 diabetes across England.
dc.contributor.author | Wilmot, Emma | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-26T11:57:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-06-26T11:57:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Diabet Med. 2018 Jun 22. doi: 10.1111/dme.13766. [Epub ahead of print] | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/500 | |
dc.description | Author(s) Pre Print Version Only. 12 Month Embargo on Post. No PDF | en |
dc.description.abstract | Since the introduction of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems more than 15 years ago and, more recently, flash glucose monitoring (Flash-GM), clinical studies have observed reductions in HbA1c , independent of insulin delivery method, with decreasing time spent in hypoglycaemia [1] and reduction in glycaemic variability [2]. CGM can improve quality of life and reduce diabetes-related distress [3], including fear of hypoglycaemia [4,5]. Despite these benefits, CGM has yet to be fully implemented as part of the standard of care for people living with Type 1 diabetes in England, and there is considerable variation in how it is funded through local payer organizations. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject | Continuous Glucose Monitoring | en |
dc.subject | CGM | en |
dc.title | Variations in access to and reimbursement for continuous glucose monitoring systems for people living with Type 1 diabetes across England. | en |
dc.type | Article | en |