Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilmot, Emma
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-26T11:57:59Z
dc.date.available2018-06-26T11:57:59Z
dc.date.issued2018-06
dc.identifier.citationDiabet Med. 2018 Jun 22. doi: 10.1111/dme.13766. [Epub ahead of print]en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/500
dc.descriptionAuthor(s) Pre Print Version Only. 12 Month Embargo on Post. No PDFen
dc.description.abstractSince the introduction of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems more than 15 years ago and, more recently, flash glucose monitoring (Flash-GM), clinical studies have observed reductions in HbA1c , independent of insulin delivery method, with decreasing time spent in hypoglycaemia [1] and reduction in glycaemic variability [2]. CGM can improve quality of life and reduce diabetes-related distress [3], including fear of hypoglycaemia [4,5]. Despite these benefits, CGM has yet to be fully implemented as part of the standard of care for people living with Type 1 diabetes in England, and there is considerable variation in how it is funded through local payer organizations.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectContinuous Glucose Monitoringen
dc.subjectCGMen
dc.titleVariations in access to and reimbursement for continuous glucose monitoring systems for people living with Type 1 diabetes across England.en
dc.typeArticleen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record