• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    • Lifestyle and Well-being
    • Behaviour Change
    • Behaviour Change
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    • Lifestyle and Well-being
    • Behaviour Change
    • Behaviour Change
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of EMERCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Links

    About EMERPoliciesDerbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation TrustLeicester Partnership TrustNHS Nottingham and Nottinghamshire CCGNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustSherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Of Leicester NHS TrustOther Resources

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Referrals for expert psychiatric opinion on dangerous offenders: A survey of instructions regarding defendants liable on conviction to a statutory assessment of dangerousness

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Bickle, Andrew
    Stankard, Paul
    Keyword
    Prisons
    Referral and consultation
    Sex offenses
    Violence
    Date
    2008
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    DOI
    10.1258/rsmmsl.48.3.211
    Publisher's URL
    http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1258/rsmmsl.48.3.211
    Abstract
    The Criminal Justice Act 2003 ('the Act') introduced significant changes to the sentencing of violent and sexual offenders. The Act brought in a statutory assessment of dangerousness which includes a statutory assumption of dangerousness ('SAD') for certain repeat offenders. Previously, expert psychiatric witnesses have commented on whether a defendant demonstrated sufficient mental instability to warrant a discretionary life sentence. Under this regime, psychiatric evidence is adduced to the assessment of dangerousness, especially for the purpose of supporting or undermining a rebuttal of the statutory assumption. This study investigated how legal referrers are instructing psychiatrists in cases where on conviction there will be an automatic assumption that the offender is dangerous. The aim was to determine whether the requirements of the new law are being outlined to expert witnesses and how much notice is being given for the production of evidence. All referrals to a medium secure unit were surveyed over two years. Fifty-one referrals concerned defendants liable to the SAD on conviction. The majority of the SAD referrals (40 referrals = 78.4%) included no request to comment on risk or dangerousness. This figure did not fall over time as the Act became established. Only a small minority (5.9%) of instructions directed the psychiatrist to the relevant statutory provisions. On average, adequate notice appeared to be given for the production of evidence (45.6 days). In the authors' view, legal referrers should make more explicit the requirements of psychiatric evidence in such cases. New legislation currently before Parliament would amend further the sentencing of such offenders, but there would remain a statutory assessment of dangerousness as the basis of sentencing violent and sexual offenders. Psychiatrists wishing to act as expert witnesses should be aware of the contents of the statutory assessment and be prepared to liaise with legal counsel to clarify instructions.
    Citation
    Bickle, A. & Stankard, P. (2008). Referrals for expert psychiatric opinion on dangerous offenders: A survey of instructions regarding defendants liable on conviction to a statutory assessment of dangerousness. Medicine, Science and the Law, 48 (3), pp.211-216.
    Type
    Article
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/5197
    Collections
    Behaviour Change
    Ethics and Law

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.