• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    • Service Delivery
    • Ethics and Law
    • Ethics and Law
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    • Service Delivery
    • Ethics and Law
    • Ethics and Law
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of EMERCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Links

    About EMERPoliciesDerbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation TrustLeicester Partnership TrustNHS Nottingham and Nottinghamshire CCGNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustSherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation TrustUniversity Hospitals Of Leicester NHS TrustOther Resources

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Fitness to plead and psychiatric reports

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Larkin, Emmet P.
    Collins, P. J.
    Keyword
    Insanity defense
    Date
    1989
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    DOI
    10.1177/002580248902900105
    Publisher's URL
    http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/002580248902900105
    Abstract
    The role of the psychiatrist in the determination of fitness to plead is reviewed by reference to 77 pre-trial psychiatric reports prepared on 31 Special Hospital patients detained under the provision of Section 5(1)(c) (Unfit to Plead) of the Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964. Each psychiatric report was analysed using a standardized checklist which addressed the legal criteria used to determine fitness to plead, the nature of the alleged offence and the clinical diagnosis. The results showed that almost 40% of the reports made no mention of fitness to plead at all and that only one-third of the reports made a statement about fitness to plead which was supported by reference to standard legal criteria. The results of this study support earlier work which has suggested that psychiatrists have a poor understanding of the issues surrounding fitness to plead and criminal responsibility. These findings are discussed in relation to recommendations made by the Report of the Committee on Mentally Abnormal Offenders, 1975 (Butler Report) and legislative changes introduced by the Mental Health Act 1983.
    Citation
    Larkin, E. P. & Collins, P. J. (1989). Fitness to plead and psychiatric reports. Medicine, Science and the Law, 29 (1), pp.26-32.
    Type
    Article
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/5512
    Collections
    Ethics and Law

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2026)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.