Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStephan, Blossom C. M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-05T15:42:18Z
dc.date.available2021-01-05T15:42:18Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationMcGrattan, A. M., Zhu, Y., Richardson, C. D., Mohan, D., Soh, Y. C., Sajjad, A., Aller, C. v., Chen, S., Paddick, S.-M., Prina, M., et al. (2020). Prevalence and risk of mild cognitive impairment in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 79 (2), pp. 743-762.en
dc.identifier.other10.3233/JAD-201043
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/8079
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUNDMild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a cognitive state associated with increased risk of dementia. Little research on MCI exists from low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), despite high prevalence of dementia in these settings.OBJECTIVEThis systematic review aimed to review epidemiological reports to determine the prevalence of MCI and its associated risk factors in LMICs.METHODSMedline, Embase, and PsycINFO were searched from inception until November 2019. Eligible articles reported on MCI in population or community-based studies from LMICs. No restrictions on the definition of MCI used as long as it was clearly defined.RESULTS4,621 articles were screened, and 78 retained. In total, n = 23 different LMICs were represented; mostly from China (n = 55 studies). Few studies from countries defined as lower-middle income (n = 14), low income (n = 4), or from population representative samples (n = 4). There was large heterogeneity in how MCI was diagnosed; with Petersen criteria the most commonly applied (n = 26). Prevalence of aMCI (Petersen criteria) ranged from 0.6%to 22.3%. Similar variability existed across studies using the International Working Group Criteria for aMCI (range 4.5%to 18.3%) and all-MCI (range 6.1%to 30.4%). Risk of MCI was associated with demographic (e.g., age), health (e.g., cardio-metabolic disease), and lifestyle (e.g., social isolation, smoking, diet and physical activity) factors.CONCLUSIONOutside of China, few MCI studies have been conducted in LMIC settings. There is an urgent need for population representative epidemiological studies to determine MCI prevalence in LMICs. MCI diagnostic methodology also needs to be standardized. This will allow for cross-study comparison and future resource planning.en
dc.description.urihttps://content.iospress.com/articles/journal-of-alzheimers-disease/jad201043en
dc.subjectCognitive dysfunctionen
dc.subjectDementiaen
dc.subjectEpidemiologyen
dc.titlePrevalence and risk of mild cognitive impairment in low and middle-income countries: A systematic reviewen
dc.typeArticleen


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record