Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGregoriou, Kyriakos
dc.contributor.authorChopra, Arun
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-29T14:20:24Z
dc.date.available2017-09-29T14:20:24Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationRowley, E., Wright, N., Waring, J., Gregoriou, K. & Chopra, A. (2014). Protocol for an exploration of knowledge sharing for improved discharge from a mental health ward. BMJ Open, 4 (9), pp.e005176.
dc.identifier.other10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005176
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/9029
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Strategies to reduce hospital admissions for mental health service users have received vast amounts of attention, yet the transfer of care from hospital to the community has been ignored. The discharge process is complex, messy, disjointed and inefficient, relying on cross-agency and organisational working. Focusing on one acute mental health admission ward, we will investigate whether the discharge process for people with severe mental health problems can be enhanced through the creation, implementation and utilisation of a knowledge sharing proforma that is used on their admission to the ward.; Methods and Analysis: The project uses qualitative interviews to understand the complex processes associated with being admitted and discharged from inpatient mental health wards. Practitioners will be asked to identify and map the relevant stakeholders involved in admission and discharge, and discuss any problems with the process. The study team will work with clinicians to develop a knowledge collection proforma, which will be piloted for 2 months. Qualitative interviews will be carried out to collect reflections on the experiences of using the tool, with data used for further refinement of the intervention. Baseline and repeat quantitative measures will be taken to illustrate any changes to length of stay and readmission rates achieved as a result of the study.; Ethics and Dissemination: A key issue is that participants are able to comment frankly on something that is a core part of their work, without fear or reprise. It is equally important that all participants are offered the opportunity to develop and coproduce the knowledge collection proforma, in order that the intervention produced is fit for purpose and usable in the real world, away from a research environment. The study has received ethical approval from Nottingham University Business School ethics committee, and has all appropriate National Health Service research governance clearances.; Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
dc.description.urihttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/4/9/e005176
dc.formatFull text uploaded
dc.subjectPatient discharge
dc.subjectPublic relations
dc.titleProtocol for an exploration of knowledge sharing for improved discharge from a mental health ward
dc.typeArticle
refterms.dateFOA2021-06-14T10:38:10Z
html.description.abstractIntroduction: Strategies to reduce hospital admissions for mental health service users have received vast amounts of attention, yet the transfer of care from hospital to the community has been ignored. The discharge process is complex, messy, disjointed and inefficient, relying on cross-agency and organisational working. Focusing on one acute mental health admission ward, we will investigate whether the discharge process for people with severe mental health problems can be enhanced through the creation, implementation and utilisation of a knowledge sharing proforma that is used on their admission to the ward.; Methods and Analysis: The project uses qualitative interviews to understand the complex processes associated with being admitted and discharged from inpatient mental health wards. Practitioners will be asked to identify and map the relevant stakeholders involved in admission and discharge, and discuss any problems with the process. The study team will work with clinicians to develop a knowledge collection proforma, which will be piloted for 2 months. Qualitative interviews will be carried out to collect reflections on the experiences of using the tool, with data used for further refinement of the intervention. Baseline and repeat quantitative measures will be taken to illustrate any changes to length of stay and readmission rates achieved as a result of the study.; Ethics and Dissemination: A key issue is that participants are able to comment frankly on something that is a core part of their work, without fear or reprise. It is equally important that all participants are offered the opportunity to develop and coproduce the knowledge collection proforma, in order that the intervention produced is fit for purpose and usable in the real world, away from a research environment. The study has received ethical approval from Nottingham University Business School ethics committee, and has all appropriate National Health Service research governance clearances.; Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Rowley 2014 1-11.pdf
Size:
944.3Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record