Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMarriott, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-29T14:20:33Z
dc.date.available2017-09-29T14:20:33Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationMarriott, M. & Kellett, S. (2009). Evaluating a cognitive analytic therapy service; practice-based outcomes and comparisons with person-centred and cognitive-behavioural therapies. Psychology and Psychotherapy, 82 (1), pp.57-72.
dc.identifier.other10.1348/147608308X336100
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/9032
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Evaluations of the clinical effectiveness of cognitive analytic therapy (CAT) are scarce and therefore represent an urgent service and research need. This paper sought to evaluate a CAT service by profiling CAT clients, examining the outcomes achieved by the CAT service and also comparing such outcomes with those achieved by other services, namely the person-centred service and the cognitive-behavioural service.; Design: Patients in routine practice were matched according to the amount of therapy time received (either brief or medium-term contracts) and the degree of initial presenting psychological distress.; Methods: Patients completed a variety of validated scales of psychological functioning (Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), and Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-32)) at assessment and termination of psychological intervention.; Results: The results indicate broad similarities between the outcomes achieved by the services, with rates of clinically significant improvement comparable, in the main, across the three services.; Conclusions: The results are discussed in terms of (a) the service delivery implications and (b) future indicated pragmatic research and evaluation efforts.;
dc.description.urihttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1348/147608308X336100/full
dc.subjectCognitive therapy
dc.subjectDepressive disorder
dc.subjectPsychotherapy
dc.titleEvaluating a cognitive analytic therapy service; practice-based outcomes and comparisons with person-centred and cognitive-behavioural therapies
dc.typeArticle
html.description.abstractObjectives: Evaluations of the clinical effectiveness of cognitive analytic therapy (CAT) are scarce and therefore represent an urgent service and research need. This paper sought to evaluate a CAT service by profiling CAT clients, examining the outcomes achieved by the CAT service and also comparing such outcomes with those achieved by other services, namely the person-centred service and the cognitive-behavioural service.; Design: Patients in routine practice were matched according to the amount of therapy time received (either brief or medium-term contracts) and the degree of initial presenting psychological distress.; Methods: Patients completed a variety of validated scales of psychological functioning (Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), and Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-32)) at assessment and termination of psychological intervention.; Results: The results indicate broad similarities between the outcomes achieved by the services, with rates of clinically significant improvement comparable, in the main, across the three services.; Conclusions: The results are discussed in terms of (a) the service delivery implications and (b) future indicated pragmatic research and evaluation efforts.;


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record