Complex case from volume 4, issue no. 4 'From science to services: Developing a neuroscience-based innovative clinical treatment model to manage severe and repetitive self-harm in a 60-year-old woman with severe personality disorders': A response to the commentaries by the complex case author
dc.contributor.author | Sarkar, Jaydip | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-09-20T16:00:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-09-20T16:00:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Sarkar, J. (2011). Complex case from volume 4, issue no. 4 'From science to services: Developing a neuroscience-based innovative clinical treatment model to manage severe and repetitive self-harm in a 60-year-old woman with severe personality disorders': A response to the commentaries by the complex case author. Personality and Mental Health, 5 (1), pp.93-94. | |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1002/pmh.153 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12904/9384 | |
dc.description.abstract | Reply by the current authors to the comments made by Finn Skårderud (see record 2011-06527-007), Anthony W. Bateman (see record 2011-06527-008) & John Gunderson (see record 2011-06527-009) on the original article (see record 2011-06527-006). While I appreciate the many interesting commentaries, I requested that the editors allow me to reply so that I might re-emphasize and/or clarify some of the points made in my clinical case lest they get lost in the commentaries provided. The neuroscience-based explanatory model proposed explains most phenomenological and behavioral aspects of the patient's lifetime and current disorders, and spans multiaxial diagnoses. Based on mammalian arousal/autonomic system regulation theory, this model offers structure and a shared intervention goal of regulating arousal to an optimal level, which facilitates social engagement. The model underpins delivery of multimodal multidisciplinary interventions. It is, however, not a new psychotherapeutic approach. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) | |
dc.description.uri | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pmh.153/full | |
dc.subject | Personality disorders | |
dc.subject | Self-injurious behaviour | |
dc.title | Complex case from volume 4, issue no. 4 'From science to services: Developing a neuroscience-based innovative clinical treatment model to manage severe and repetitive self-harm in a 60-year-old woman with severe personality disorders': A response to the commentaries by the complex case author | |
dc.type | Article | |
html.description.abstract | Reply by the current authors to the comments made by Finn Skårderud (see record 2011-06527-007), Anthony W. Bateman (see record 2011-06527-008) & John Gunderson (see record 2011-06527-009) on the original article (see record 2011-06527-006). While I appreciate the many interesting commentaries, I requested that the editors allow me to reply so that I might re-emphasize and/or clarify some of the points made in my clinical case lest they get lost in the commentaries provided. The neuroscience-based explanatory model proposed explains most phenomenological and behavioral aspects of the patient's lifetime and current disorders, and spans multiaxial diagnoses. Based on mammalian arousal/autonomic system regulation theory, this model offers structure and a shared intervention goal of regulating arousal to an optimal level, which facilitates social engagement. The model underpins delivery of multimodal multidisciplinary interventions. It is, however, not a new psychotherapeutic approach. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) |